Ashish seeks speedy justice against Kangana
Writer Ashish Kaul, who all has filed an FIR against celebrity Kangana Ranaut for copyright infringement, has now written a good letter to Khar law enforcement station to take a great update on a single. In his letter, Ashish, through his attorney, mentioned that he has no information on the improvement of the circumstance including whether the find has been served to the accused.
He wrote the letter to the senior inspector of Khar law enforcement station to seek speedy justice and timely follow-up on the case. Earlier, Ashish claimed that he has the single copyright of the biography on 'Didda: The Warrior Queen' and alleged that Kangana offers stolen his report. He stated he was surprised to listen to the announcement from Kangana about the film. He actually sent a find to Kangana and maker Kamal Jain, however, did not receive any response for the same and for that reason had to strategy the courtroom which directed the authorities to lodge a circumstance.
Speaking about the circumstance, Kaul had stated, "Today, I embark after a fresh journey of my life - a quest against white-collar criminal offense, against blatant and brazen infringement of my own intellectual property and pertaining to justice. After striving my best to run across various police stations, I have positioned prior to the Hon'ble Metropolitan Magistrate, Bandra, my request Under Section 156(3) of CrPC, 1973 trying to find course to the Mumbai Law enforcement to register FIR against the accused persons/entity namely Ms. Kangana Ranaut, Mr. Kamal Kumar Jain, Ms. Rangoli Chandel and Manikarnika Films Individual Small for infringement of the copyright which sums to criminal breach of trust, cheating, cheating with understanding that wrongful reduction may ensue to the individual whose interest offender will protect and also cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of residence, punishable under Section 406, 415, 418, 34, 120 B And 420 of the Indian Penal Code reading with Section 51, 63, 63A and various other provision of The Copyright Action, 1957 AND Section 65 of the Information Technology Act, 2000."
He further added, "Immediately after a tumultuous fortnight of arriving at terms that persons in power, people with might and funds can steamroll the privileges of articles creators by misrepresenting and manipulating the letter and spirit of regulations. This act involves going for a common citizen for granted who'll not be conveniently entertained or helped by the authorities, put into it the reputation of the alleged well-known public amount against whom a common citizen is seeking support from the police! Alas, their perception is definitely nothing but the real truth given the number of situations this perception has been strengthened by the unhelpful frame of mind of law enforcement in such instances and I mean such typical circumstances in which a commoner decides to improve his tone of voice against the arm twisting, morale breaking and destructive deeds pursued by a open public figure."
