IBM says ‘no more’ to face recognition organization as #BlackLivesMatter gains momentum
IBM said Monday it really is no more selling general purpose face recognition program and is against working with such technology for racial profiling or perhaps mass surveillance.
The stance against facial recognition systems that may potentially be used to target minorities or violate human being rights was contained in a letter IBM’s leader sent to members folks Congress.
“IBM no more offers general purpose IBM face recognition or analysis software,” wrote Arvind Krishna.
“IBM firmly opposes and can certainly not condone uses of any technology, including face recognition technology offered by other suppliers, for mass surveillance, racial profiling, violations of primary man rights and freedoms.”
The century-old technology firm needed responsible national standards regarding how facial recognition systems should be employed by police agencies.
“Technology can increase transparency and support police protect communities but should never promote discrimination or perhaps racial injustice,” Krishna said.
“Vendors and users of (artificial intelligence) systems have a good shared responsibility to make sure that Al is tested for bias, particularity when found in police,” he contended.
Technology such as for example body cameras and info analytics tools should be used to hold police officers accountable as well as for open public safety, according to Krishna.
IBM offered to work with Congress to pursue “justice and racial equity” focused primarily on police reform, and responsible make use of technology and broadening expertise.
The American Civil Liberties Union senior legislative counsel Neema Singh Guliani argued that facial recognition should not be integrated into body cameras worn by cops.
“Body cameras are designed to be tools for accountability, not law enforcement surveillance,” Guliani said found in a good statement released in regards to policing reform measures being proposed in Congress.
“We need to invest in technologies that will help eradicate the digital divide, not systems that induce a surveillance infrastructure that exacerbates policing abuses and structural racism.”
