Wisden costs Shakib as 2nd MVP of 21st century
Bangladeshi all-rounder Shakib Al Hasan has been rated as the second Most Valuable Person (MVP) of the 21st century in ODI cricket by world famous cricket monthly "Wisden".
Shakib, who has been banned for a time, can be ranked sixth in Lab tests, but did not get yourself a place in the most notable 20 in T20 format.
Wisden has revealed the set of the most effective players (MVP) of the present day century in their month to month edition 33, published found in July.
In a statement on Saturday, State Minister for Youth and Sports Zahid Ahsan Russell congratulated Shakib to be decided on as second most effective player of the century in ODI cricket by Wisden.
"It's very very good news for the countrymen through the deadly Covid-19 situations. It's a very big achievement for us. With this feat, our job in universe cricket will further come to be strongthened and I really do hope Shakib will bring more laurel for the united states continuing his great form in potential," he added.
Also read: ICC bans Shakib from all kinds of cricket for 24 months
Wisden has selected the ‘Most Valuable Players’ (MVP) in a joint review with cricket statistics organisation Cricviz and the MVP collection is decided on the same as how much a new player contributed to the meet.
Lankan spin wizard Muttiah Muralitharan has been named the most valuable player in Tests, ex - England all-rounder Andrew Flintoff has been named the best player in ODIs while Afghan leg-spinner Rashid Khan got the honour on T20 format.
Aside from Muralitharan, Shakib is accompanied by India’s Rabindra Jadeja, Australia’s Steve Smith, Glenn McGrath and South Africa’s Shaun Pollock.
The formula invented by Cricviz’s info scientist Sam Green, was used to choose the MVPs. The formula calculates just how much a person has done better or worse than others in a meet for a group. The average is after that added after adding items to all the fits played at the pointed time period.
However, Wisden Cricket Monthly has said they have certainly not selected the ‘most effective’ players, but have found the virtually all influential cricketers of that time period.
