Is Apple being a bully? Its payments platform faces two EU antitrust investigations

Technology
Is Apple being a bully? Its payments platform faces two EU antitrust investigations
The EU’s powerful competition authority opened a number of cases against Apple on Tuesday, in an indicator that Brussels was not backing down in its efforts to rein in US-based tech giants.

The cases put Apple back into the crosshairs four years after Brussels ordered the California-based giant to settle 13 billion euros ($14.7 billion at current rates) in back taxes on antitrust concerns.

The claims-which Apple angrily rejects-territory as Brussels is preparing historic changes to EU law that could beef up Europe’s capability to limit the size and power of so-called digital “gate-keepers” that also include Amazon, Google and Facebook.

In the EU’s initially case, the European Commission followed a complaint brought by Sweden-based Spotify and others that accused Apple of earning unfair utilization of its app store to market its Apple Music.

The commission also launched a detailed investigation into Apple Pay predicated on concerns that the fast-growing and easy-to-use payment system is shutting out rivals.

‘Gate-keeper’

Spotify filed a formal complaint in 2019 that took issue with constraints by Apple on software that don’t make use of its payment system in its App Store.

Apple takes a 30 percent slash from businesses which consists of retailer, which Spotify says amounts to a violation of good competition rules.

“It would appear that Apple obtained a ‘gatekeeper’ role in terms of the distribution of programs and articles to users of Apple’s popular units,” said EU Executive Vice President Margrethe Vestager in a statement.

“We need to make certain that Apple’s rules usually do not distort competition in marketplaces where Apple is competing with other iphone app developers, for example with its music streaming services Apple Music or perhaps with Apple Books.”

The European Union’s in-depth investigations usually do not necessarily mean a fault has been found, and there is absolutely no deadline for the commission to complete its case.

However the commission said it could pursue the case “as a matter of concern” amid complaints that the EU movements too gradually in clamping down on the fast-changing tech business.

“Apple’s anticompetitive behaviour has intentionally disadvantaged competitors, created an unlevel playing discipline, and deprived buyers of meaningful decision for far too prolonged,” Spotify said in a statement.

“We welcome the European Commission’s decision to formally investigate Apple, and trust they’ll action with urgency to make sure good competition on the iOS program for all participants in the digital market,” it added.

‘Free ride’

Vestager also opened a full-level probe into Apple Pay out where authorities come to mind that the business could have a commanding lead in a booming business.

Released in 2014, Apple Spend allows iPhone users to create payments at retailers simply by touching their devices to the same terminals at present used for credit rating and debit cards.

But any company wanting to use the technology on an iPhone-whether a bank or the London metro system-must pass through Apple Purchase a fee.

Apple rejected the legality of the conditions and hit out in its rivals.

“It’s disappointing the European Commission is advancing baseless complaints from a handful of companies who merely want a free of charge ride, and don’t want to take up by the same guidelines as everybody else,” Apple said.

“We don’t think that’s right-we prefer to maintain a level playing field where a person with determination and a good idea may succeed,” the business added.
Tags :
Share This News On: